The last video felt almost like a personal attack. I’ve been thinking recently about how taste is not identity, and how, ultimately, you are measured by what you create rather than what you consume. This fixation on taste as a skill that defines you is a key component of the connoisseur mindset, and it’s definitely a trap I’ve fallen into.
What I can’t quite figure out is how to go back. I can let go of identifying as a connoisseur and make an effort to enjoy more things uncritically, but I can’t change my perception through sheer effort.
I’m never going to be able to listen to a 128 kbps MP3 on a bluetooth speaker and convince myself it’s comparable to hearing FLAC on HD600s or studio monitors. I can decide it doesn’t matter, and I can enjoy the music either way, but I will always fixate on audio quality because I’ve spent hundreds or thousands of hours comparing different headphones, tweaking EQ settings, and trying to dial in specific aspects of sound that I enjoy. I don’t know how to turn that off. On a more immediate, sensory level, I can’t change my mindset and suddenly believe that a $20 clone fragrance smells the same as Tom Ford Tobacco Vanille. I can appreciate it for what it is, but I’m always going to know the difference because I’ve experienced the “better” version. This carries over into everything else: fashion, art, food, all the usual bourgeois pursuits I would like to believe I’m immune to, but clearly am not. Framing it as being about connoisseurship rather than indulgence or status makes it easier to justify, but no less problematic.
I want to get over this way of thinking entirely, but I’m afraid it will remain in the background, continuing to limit both the range of things I can enjoy and the extent to which I enjoy anything at all, since even “good” things are experienced within a critical framework that compares them to what might be even better.